遗产研究国际动态2023年第五期(总第十一期) The Heritage Spectator 2023 No. 11
时间: 2023-09-05  作者:   浏览次数: 894

联合实验室中英双语双月刊《遗产研究国际动态》(内刊)2023年第五期(总第十一期)已发布,全刊内容可在此下载

JLBRI国家“一带一路“联合实验室《遗产研究国际动态》总第十一期 The Heritage Spectator No.11.pdf






前沿研究


韩国“首尔未来遗产”认定制度研究


开发主义盛行的环境下,韩国首尔市城区大批近现代建筑在未进行有效文化价值评估的基础上,就被损毁拆除。随着承载首尔市民共同记忆的城市空间不断消失,首尔的城市文化特色与市民的城市认同感也逐渐消融殆尽。在这样的背景下,诞生了“首尔未来遗产”认定制度。首尔市政府最早在2012年6月提出了《近现代遗产的未来遗产化基本构想》,2013年6月发布了《首尔市未来遗产保全事业民间公募计划》,8月制定的《首尔市未来遗产总体规划》中公布了1000余处未来遗产候选对象,10月在征得候选对象产权人同意后开始展开现场调查。2014年10月出台的《首尔市未来遗产保全综合计划》对未来遗产制度的目标与推进方式进行了具体阐释。2015年7月《首尔特别市未来遗产保存管理及活用的相关条例》正式颁布。


Research on Seoul Future Heritage Recognition System in Republic of Korea

Under the prevailing environment of developmentism, a large number of modern buildings in the urban area of Seoul were destroyed and demolished without effective cultural value assessment. As the urban space that carries the common memory of Seoul citizens continues to disappear, the urban cultural characteristics of Seoul and the sense of urban identity of the citizens have gradually disappeared.Against this background, the Seoul Future Heritage certification system was born. The Seoul Metropolitan Government first put forward the Basic Conception of Future Heritageization of Modern and Modern Heritage in June 2012. More than 1,000 future heritage candidates were announced in the Master Plan, and on-site investigations began in October after obtaining the consent of the property owners of the candidates. The Seoul City Future Heritage Preservation Comprehensive Plan issued in October 2014 specifically explained the goals and promotion methods of the future heritage system. In July 2015, the Related Regulations on the Preservation, Management and Utilization of Future Heritage in Seoul Special City was officially promulgated.


实践案例


韩国东关王庙修复综合调研项目


韩国的关公崇拜与明朝时期在朝鲜半岛对日战争的胜利有关。明朝皇帝明神宗分别于 1592 年和 1597 年两次出兵援助朝鲜抗倭,前后用兵数十万,战争终于取得胜利。1597 年( 宣祖 31 年) ,在援朝明将陈寅提议与组织下,建造完成朝鲜半岛第一座关王庙。这种始于明朝赴韩抗日将领的建庙行为,带动了韩国人对关公的崇拜。


中国明清两代时期关公文化发展到鼎盛阶段。中国封建王朝对关公的封溢也达到了顶峰,关公在社会和民间的影响力达到了空前的程度。明朝皇帝对关公封溢5次之多,随着关公崇拜现象发展到顶峰,关公庙宇在世界范围的发展也达到了空前的规模。


史料对韩国东庙(东关王庙)的最初记载为1599年,建成之后,历代朝鲜皇帝亲自前去祭祀,1908年除了东庙,其余的韩国关帝庙皆受到巨大破坏,西关王庙与北关王庙被毁,但雕塑与匾额等被合并到东庙。东庙在1963年被文化财厅指定为“宝物”,是在首尔规模最大的关帝庙。


Comprehensive Research Project for Restoration of DongMiao Temple in Republic of Korea


The worship of Guan Gong in Republic of Korea is related to the victory of the war against Japan on the Korean peninsula during the Ming Dynasty. Wanli Emperor of the Ming Dynasty sent troops twice to aid Korean peninsula in fighting the Japanese in 1592 and 1597 respectively. He used hundreds of thousands of troops, and the war was finally won. In 1597, under the proposal and organization of Chen Yin, the first Guanwang Temple on the Korean Peninsula was built and completed. This kind of temple building behavior began with the generals who went to Korean peninsula to resist Japan in the Ming Dynasty, which led to the worship of Guan Gong by Koreans.

During the Ming and Qing dynasties in China, Guan Gong culture developed to its peak stage. Chinese feudal dynasties also reached the peak in their enshrinement and reverence of Guan Gong; his influence in society and among the people reached an unprecedented level. The emperor of the Ming Dynasty conferred on Guan Gong five times. With the development of the phenomenon of worshiping Guan Gong to its peak, the development of Guan Gong temples in the world has also reached an unprecedented scale. 

The first record of the Dongmiao Temple(DongGuanWangmiao)  in Republic of Korea in historical materials was in 1599. After its completion, the Korean emperors went to sacrifice in person. In 1908, except for the Dongmiao Temple, the rest of the Guandi Temple in Republic of Korea were greatly damaged. The Beiguanwang Temple was destroyed, but the sculptures and plaques were merged into the Dongmiao Temple. Dongmiao Temple was designated as a Treasure by the Cultural Heritage Administration in 1963. It is the largest Guandi Temple in Seoul.

 

平台动态


空间效益视角下的城市更新项目选址评估——以澳门特别行政区为例


澳门的市区重建最早开始于2005年的“旧区重整咨询委员会”(“旧区重整法律制度”)。2016年,“城市更新委员会”(第5/2016号行政法规)成立,取代旧区重整咨询委员会。直到 2019 年,政府主导的“都市更新股份有限公司”(第12/201号行政法规)才成立15余年。与此同时,澳门正在迅速老化;许多建筑濒临危险;市民人身安全受到威胁,城市环境恶化,迫切需要城市有机更新。澳门的市区重建进展缓慢。建立城市更新法律和制度耗时多年,实施城市更新项目更是难上加难。此外,城市空间改造项目投资缺乏客观的评估方法,开发商无法有效判断城市更新项目选址结果是否有利于资源合理配置和效益最大化。空间和经济投入-产出风险的不确定性往往阻碍了城市更新项目的进展。


因此,本文尝试基于空间效益视角和DEA模型对澳门地区城市更新的表现进行分析,DEA模型有效地反映了城市更新项目在空间上的社会、经济和环境间的关系,强调在不进行无量纲化处理和权重赋值的情况下,根据投入和产出对项目实施的成本效益进行评估,从而实现空间资源最大限度的合理配置。本文还通过综合评价方法,进一步对比验证了DEA模型对城市更新选址效益评估的客观性和有效性,并为解决澳门城市更新利益分配中存在的问题提供启示和参考。


Evaluation on Site Selection of Urban Renewal Projects from the Perspective of Space Benefit: Macau Special Administrative Region as an Example 


Macau’s urban redevelopment first originated from the “Consultation Committee on Restructuring of Old Areas” (“Legal System for Restructuring of Old Areas”) in 2005. In 2016, the “Urban Renewal Committee” (Administrative Regulation No. 5/2016) was established to replace the Restructuring of Old Areas. It was not until 2019 that a government-led “Urban Renewal Co., Ltd. (Administrative Regulation No. 12/2019) was established more than 15 years ago. At the same time, the city of Macau is rapidly ageing; many buildings are on the verge of becoming dangerous; threats to the personal safety of citizens and the deterioration of the urban environment urgently require the organic renewal of the city. Urban renewal in Macau has been slow. It has taken many years to establish urban renewal laws and institutions, and it is even more difficult to implement urban renewal projects. In addition, there is a lack of objective evaluation methods for urban spatial transformation project investment, and developers cannot effectively judge whether the outcome of urban renewal project selection is conducive to rational resource allocation and benefit maximization. The uncertainty of spatial and economic input-output risks often hinders the progress of urban renewal projects. 

Therefore, this study attempts to analyze the urban renewal performance of the Macau region based on the perspective of spatial benefits and the DEA model, which effectively reflects the relationship between social, economic, and environmental aspects of urban renewal projects in terms of space and emphasizes the assessment of the cost-benefit of project implementation in terms of inputs and outputs without dimensionless processing and weight assignment treatment, so as to achieve the maximum rational allocation of spatial resources. It also further validates the objectivity and efficiency of the DEA model as an assessment of the benefits of urban renewal site selection by using the comprehensive evaluation method as a comparison. It provides ideas and references for solving the existing problems of allocating the benefits of urban renewal in Macau.

资料来源:

陈泽辉,邢亚龙,黄广,李静娴. 空间效益视角下的城市更新项目选址评估——以澳门特别行政区为例.Journal of Mathematics (2023): n. pag. 


活动报道


第五届世界遗产地管理者论坛:“世界遗产管理未来50年”


沙特阿拉伯王国国家委员会和遗产委员会代表国家文化部,同联合国教科文组织世界遗产中心、国际文物保护与修复研究中心(ICCROM )和国际自然保护联盟(IUCN)与国际古迹遗址理事会(ICOMOS)密切合作,主办第五届世界遗产地管理者论坛(WHSMF23),该论坛将与世界遗产委员会第四十五届扩大会议同时举办,论坛主题为“世界遗产管理未来50年”。


论坛邀请了来自世界各地的联合国教科文组织世界遗产地管理者和世界遗产地管理系统内工作人员,旨在继续在国际舞台上为世界遗产地管理者赋能。


5th World Heritage Site Managers' Forum: Managing World Heritage for the Next 50 Years

The Ministry of Culture of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia represented by the National Committee and the Heritage Commission alongside with the UNESCO World Heritage Centre, ICCROM and IUCN, in close partnership with ICOMOS, will be hosting the 5th edition of the World Heritage Site Managers’ Forum (WHSMF23) which will be organised in conjunction to the extended 45th session of the World Heritage Committee, with the theme selected for the Forum as Managing World Heritage for the Next 50 Years.

UNESCO World Heritage site managers and persons working within World Heritage site management systems from across the globe are invited to participate in this year’s Forum, aimed at continuing to empower World Heritage site managers on the international stage. 


第四届联合国教科文组织名录遗产与可持续发展黄山对话会


第四届联合国教科文组织名录遗产与可持续发展黄山对话会(简称“第四届黄山对话会”)于6月29日在安徽省黄山市开幕。


会议旨在为专家、政策决策者和从业人员提供平台,分享保护和管理全球2000多个联合国教科文组织名录遗产经验,包括世界文化遗产、生物圈保护区和全球地质公园,并构建愿景以更好地保护全球遗产,并增强它们对实施《世界遗产公约》和联合国2030年可持续发展议程的贡献。


4th Huangshan Dialogue on UNESCO-designated Sites and Sustainable Development

The 4th Huangshan Dialogue on UNESCO-designed Sites and Sustainable Development opened at Huangshan City in east China's Anhui Province on June 29, 2023. 

Themed Digital Technologies Enabling Sustainable Development of UNESCO-designed Sites, the two-day event attracted over 200 participants from more than 20 countries and over ten international organizations including the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), and the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM). 


澳门城市大学2023文化遗产保护及克拉克瓷国际学术研讨会


为推动粤港澳大湾区文化遗产保护事业发展,探索文化遗产保护人才培养教育工作,5月22日,澳门城市大学创新设计学院联合南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海)举办了澳门城市大学2023年文化遗产保护国际学术研讨会。国内外高校、科研机构、行业协会、企事业单位约百名代表参会。


City University of Macau 2023 International Symposium on Cultural Heritage Conservation and Clark Porcelain

To promote the development of cultural heritage conservation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and explore the education of talents in cultural heritage conservation, on May 22nd, Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, in collaboration with Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), held the 2023 International Symposium on Cultural Heritage Conservation. Approximately one hundred representatives from domestic and foreign universities, research institutions, industry associations, and enterprises participated in the Symposium.

资料来源:

https://whc.unesco.org/en/whsmf23

https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/2552/

http://www.unesco-hist.org/index.php?r=en/article/info&id=1730

http://www.ncha.gov.cn/art/2021/5/27/art_723_168210.html